Arizona

  Civil Rights Attorneys.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
January 30, 2012
Civil-Right
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Arizona Civil Rights News

 

Ohio Public Defender Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Challenging Ohio’s Lethal Injection Procedure

(Columbus)—

The Office of the Ohio Public Defender (OPD) yesterday filed a civil rights lawsuit in the Federal Southern District Court of Ohio challenging the constitutionality of Ohio’s lethal injection protocol. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two Ohio death row inmates, Adremy Dennis and Richard W. Cooey, II.

Ohio’s lethal injection protocol includes a short-term anesthetic and a paralyzing drug, which could combine to leave an inmate conscious but paralyzed, trapping him in a chemical tomb that hides the excruciatingly painful effects of death by suffocation and heart attack. Veterinarians forbid using the same combination of drugs for euthanizing pets, in order to avoid inflicting pain on animals. At bare minimum, the OPD argues that we as a civilized society should not be executing human beings by using drugs veterinarians won’t use to put pets to sleep.

In the lawsuit filed yesterday, the OPD argues that the use of the paralyzing drug, pancuronium bromide, is a violation of Dennis’ and Cooey’s rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution: "[Ohio’s] current method of lethal injection can and will, in effect, cause them to be tortured to death. No government within the United States can intentionally or negligently use an arbitrary, cruel, and/or unreliable method of execution."

The lawsuit goes on to argue that Ohio’s "lethal injection protocol includes an unreliable ultrashort-acting anesthetic that can and will leave [Dennis and Cooey] conscious but trapped in a paralyzed body wracked with the pain of suffocation and a heart attack. [The State of Ohio] intend[s] to execute [Dennis and Cooey] with unreliable and arbitrary drugs, administered by inadequately trained personnel, who use inappropriate equipment and methods to cause death by lethal injection."

Earlier this year, the OPD filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of Lewis Williams and John Glenn Roe. Due to then-existing technicalities, that lawsuit was dismissed without any rulings on the facts, and both Williams and Roe were executed. The OPD believes that the technical barriers to challenging Ohio lethal injection methods were effectively lifted by the United States Supreme Court’s decision on May 24, 2004 in Nelson v. Campbell, where the Court allowed an Alabama death-row inmate to use the civil rights statute to challenge lethal injection procedures.

Contact a Arizona civil rights lawyer today and get a free consultation!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Unfair treatment is not necessarily unlawful discrimination.


 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Civil Rights cases in Arizona and nationwide:

Former Memphis Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Civil Rights Violations
Alexander Johnson, a former officer with the Memphis Police Department, pleaded guilty today to a one-count felony violation for conspiring to depr...
Read more >


Accused Sex Trafficker Arraigned in Federal Court
Consuelo Carreto-Valencia, an accused sex trafficker extradited to the United States from Mexico in January, was arraigned today in federal court o...
Read more >


7th Annual Kingsley Heritage Celebration, The Power of Faith
A full afternoon of presentations exploring the importance of faith to eighteenth- and nineteenth-century African American slaves in the fight for ...
Read more >


More Civil Rights News >

 
 

Civil Rights Attorneys.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Color Discrimination

Definition:
Discrimination based on color occurs when individuals are treated less favorably than others who are similarly situated because of the color of their skin. This is a separately identifiable type of discrimination, which can also occur in conjunction with race discrimination.

Sexual Harassment

Definition:
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when: Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term condition of employment; Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or Such conduct has the purpose or effect or unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

Employment agency

Definition:
Means any person regularly undertakingwith or without compensation to procure employees for an employer or to procure for employees opportunities to work for an employer and includes an agent of such a person.

More Civil Rights Attorneys.com Terms >

 

Search Site:

 
 

Civil Rights Resources

 


Search Civil Rights resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

Civil Rights Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Civil Rights:

  • Criminal Justice
  • Death Penalty
  • Disability Rights
  • Drug Policy
  • Free Speech

More Civil Rights Topics >

Arizona Civil-Right Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Civil-Right attorney you should contact our Civil-Right Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Apache Junction
  • Avondale
  • Buckeye
  • Bullhead City
  • Casa Grande
  • Cave Creek
  • Chandler
  • Chino Valley
  • Cottonwood
  • Douglas
  • Flagstaff
  • Florence
  • Fountain Hills
  • Gilbert
  • Glendale
  • Green Valley
  • Kingman
  • Lake Havasu City
  • Mesa
  • Nogales
  • Paradise Valley
  • Payson
  • Peoria
  • Phoenix
  • Prescott Valley
  • Safford
  • Scottsdale
  • Sierra Vista
  • Somerton
  • Sun City
  • Sun City West
  • Surprise
  • Tempe
  • Tucson
  • Yuma
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Arizona Civil Rights Attorneys.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.